SDETrims.DBO.Eco_Soils

Metadata also available as

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title: SDETrims.DBO.Eco_Soils
Abstract:
This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely sensed and other information.

This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the National Soil Information System relational database, which gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.

Supplemental_Information:
Digital versions of hydrography, cultural features, and other associated layers that are not part of the SSURGO data set may be available from the primary organization listed in the Point of Contact.
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 20070102, SDETrims.DBO.Eco_Soils: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Online Links:

    • Service=sde:sqlserver:CHUCKNORRIS; Database=SDETrims; Version=dbo.DEFAULT

    Other_Citation_Details:
    tx001 tx009 tx071 tx077 tx085 tx097 tx113 tx121 tx139 tx147 tx161 tx181 tx185 tx199 tx213 tx217 tx221 tx225 tx231 tx237 tx251 tx257 tx289 tx291 tx293 tx313 tx337 tx349 tx367 tx373 tx407 tx439 tx455 tx467 tx471 tx497 tx503

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -98.954905
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -94.071095
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 34.143142
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 29.496347

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Beginning_Date: 26-Jun-2003
    Ending_Date: 02-Jan-2007
    Currentness_Reference: publication date

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      This is a Vector data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):

      • G-polygon (318975)

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitudes are given to the nearest 0.000000. Longitudes are given to the nearest 0.000000. Latitude and longitude values are specified in Decimal degrees.

      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1983.
      The ellipsoid used is Geodetic Reference System 80.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.000000.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257222.

      Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
      Altitude_System_Definition:
      Altitude_Resolution: 1.000000
      Altitude_Encoding_Method:
      Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    SDETrims.DBO.Eco_Soils
    Special Soil Features represent soil, miscellaneous area, or landform features that are too small to be digitized as soil delineations (area features). (Source: Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS.)

    OBJECTID
    Internal feature number. (Source: ESRI)

    Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.

    AREASYMBOL

    SPATIALVER

    MUSYM

    MUKEY

    Shape
    Feature geometry. (Source: ESRI)

    Coordinates defining the features.

    Shape.area

    Shape.len

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Anderson County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Archer County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Chambers County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Clay County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Collin County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Cooke County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Dallas County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Denton County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Ellis County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Fannin County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Freestone County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Grayson County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Grimes County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Hardin County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Henderson County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Hill County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Hood County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Houston County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Hunt County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Jack County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Johnson County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Kaufman County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Leon County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Liberty County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Limestone County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Madison County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Montague County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Navarro County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Parker County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Polk County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Rockwall County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of San Jacinto County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Tarrant County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Trinity County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Van Zandt County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Walker County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Wise County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Young County,
    Codeset Source:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    Map Unit Delineations are closed polygons that may be dominated by a single soil or miscellaneous area component plus allowable similar or dissimilar soils, or they can be geographic mixtures of groups of soils or soils and miscellaneous areas.

    The map unit symbol uniquely identifies each closed map unit delineation. Each symbol corresponds to a map unit name. The map unit key is used to link to information in the National Soil Information System tables.

    Map Unit Delineations are described by the National Soil Information System database. This attribute database gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and the properties for each soil. The database contains both estimated and measured data on the physical and chemical soil properties and soil interpretations for engineering, water management, recreation, agronomic, woodland, range, and wildlife uses of the soil.

    The National Soil Information System database contains static metadata. It documents the data structure and includes such information as what tables, columns, indexes, and relationships are defined as well as a variety of attributes of each of these database objects. Attributes include table and column descriptions and detailed domain information.

    The National Soil Information System database also contains a distribution metadata. It records the criteria used for selecting map units and components for inclusion in the set of distributed data.

    Special features are described in the feature table. It includes an area symbol, feature label, feature name, and feature description for each special and ad hoc feature in the survey area.

    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
    Soil Taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Agricultural Handbook 436, 1999, USDA, SCS.

    Keys to Soil Taxonomy (current issue), USDA, SCS.

    National Soil Survey Handbook, Title 430-VI, part 647 (current issue), USDA, NRCS.

    Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS.


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
    State Soil Scientist
    USDA-NRCS
    Temple, Tx 76501

    1-254-742-9851 (voice)
    1-254-742-9859 (FAX)
    levi.steptoe@tx.usda.nrcs.gov


Why was the data set created?

SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

    SCS1 (source 1 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1975, Soil Survey of Anderson County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations and soil symbols

    NRCS1 (source 2 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, unpublished material, publication annotation overlays.

    Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    final publication negatives used to develop ratioed soil survey film positives

    NRCS2 (source 3 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, unpublished material, ratioed soil survey film positives of publication annotation overlays.

    Type_of_Source_Media: stable base material
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS3 (source 4 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, unpublished material, multiple 7.5 minute orthophotographs.

    Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: compilation base

    NRCS4 (source 5 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, unpublished material, annotated stable-base overlays.

    Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: source material for scanning

    NRCS5 (source 6 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Anderson County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NASIS (source 7 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2004, National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Collins, Colorado.

    Type_of_Source_Media: database
    Source_Contribution: attribute (tabular) information

    NRCS1 (source 8 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1995, Soil Survey of Archer County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: source of soil map unit delineations and soil symbols

    NRCS6 (source 9 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2003, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Archer County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natrual Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS7 (source 10 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2004, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Archer County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevalution of data

    SCS1 (source 11 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1976, Soil Survey of Chambers County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 12 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Chambers County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 13 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Chambers County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 14 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1980, Soil Survey of Clay County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 15 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2003, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Clay County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 16 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1969, Soil Survey of Collin County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 17 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2001, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Collin County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 18 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Collin County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 19 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1979, Soil Survey of Cooke County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    (source 20 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2001, Cooke County, Texas SSURGO.

    SCS1 (source 21 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1980, Soil Survey of Dallas County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS4 (source 22 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Dallas County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS5 (source 23 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Dallas County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 24 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Dallas County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS7 (source 25 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2004, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Dallas County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 26 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1980, Soil Survey of Denton County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 27 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Denton County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 28 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Denton County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 29 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1964, Soil Survey of Ellis County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 30 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Ellis County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 31 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Ellis County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 32 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2000, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Fannin County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 33 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Fannin County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS1 (source 34 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey of Freestone County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: source of soil map unit delineations and soil symbols

    NRCS4 (source 35 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2003, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Freestone County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 36 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1980, Soil Survey of Grayson County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 37 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Grayson County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 38 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Grayson County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 39 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Grimes County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS2 (source 40 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2003, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Hardin County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS3 (source 41 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Hardin County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS4 (source 42 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2004, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Hardin County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS5 (source 43 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2005, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Hardin County,: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 44 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1979, Soil Survey of Henderson County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    SCS1 (source 45 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1978, Soil Survey of Hill County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution: source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols

    NRCS5 (source 46 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2000, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Hill County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 47 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Hill County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 48 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1978, Soil Survey of Hood and Somervell Counties, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 49 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1997, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Hood and Somervell Counties, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 50 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Hood and Somervell, Counties, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 51 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey of Houston County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols

    NRCS6 (source 52 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2003, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Houston County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 53 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1981, Soil Survey of Hunt County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols

    NRCS5 (source 54 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Hunt County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 55 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2004, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Hunt County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS5 (source 56 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2000, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Jack County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 57 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Jack County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS7 (source 58 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2003, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Jack County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 59 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1985, Soil Survey of Johnson County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 60 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Johnson County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 61 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Johnson County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 62 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1977, Soil Survey of Kaufman and Rockwall Counties, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 63 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2001, Kaufman and Rockwall Counties, Texas SSURGO.

    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in rearchival process

    NRCS6 (source 64 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Kaufman and Rockwall, Counties, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 65 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1989, Soil Survey of Leon County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: source of soil map unit delineations and soil symbols

    NRCS5 (source 66 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2003, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Leon County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS2 (source 67 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1996, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Liberty County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS3 (source 68 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Liberty County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 69 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, 1998, Soil Survey of Limestone County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 70 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Limestone County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 71 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Limestone County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 72 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1994, Soil Survey of Madison County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 73 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2000, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Madison County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 74 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Madison County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 75 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1978, Soil Survey of Montague County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 76 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Montague County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 77 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1974, Soil Survey of Navarro County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    (source 78 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1977, Soil Survey of Parker County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    NRCS5 (source 79 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2001, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Parker County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 80 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1988, Soil Survey of Polk and San Jacinto Counties, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 81 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2000, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Polk and San Jacinto Counties, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 82 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1981, Soil Survey of Tarrant County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 83 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1998, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Tarrant County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 84 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Tarrant County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS7 (source 85 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Tarrant County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS2 (source 86 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Trinity County, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS3 (source 87 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Trinity County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS1 (source 88 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1998, Soil Survey of Van Zandt County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS6 (source 89 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2001, Van Zandt County, Texas SSURGO.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in rearchival process

    NRCS7 (source 90 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Van Zandt County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 91 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1979, Soil Survey of Walker County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features

    NRCS5 (source 92 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2003, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Walker County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS6 (source 93 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2004, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Walker County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    SCS1 (source 94 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1989, Soil Survey of Wise County, Texas: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution:
    source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols, and special soil features. Scanning source

    NRCS3 (source 95 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2002, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Wise County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

    NRCS2 (source 96 of 96)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2003, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Young County, Texas: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Type_of_Source_Media: online
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: 2002 (process 1 of 66)
    The Anderson County, Texas Soil Survey was initiated in 1967 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1970. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2002 . It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Five additional map units were added to the soil survey. The change was made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM----Dams GP-----Gravel Pits OW-----Oil Wasteland QU-----Quarries W------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2003 (process 2 of 66)
    The Archer County, Texas Soil Survey was published in 1995 at 1:24000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1986. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2003. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM-----Dam W-------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS1

    Date: 1998 (process 3 of 66)
    The Chambers County Soil Survey was published in 1976 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1969. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 1998. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Five additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    BP-----Borrow Pit DAM----Dams M-W----Miscellaneous Water OW-----Oil Wasteland W------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2003 (process 4 of 66)
    The Clay County Soil Survey was published in 1980 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map units names were finalized at the final correlation in 1977. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2002. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Four additional map units were added to the soil survey. These changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM---Dams OW----Oil Waste Land GP----Pits, Gravel W-----Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2001 (process 5 of 66)
    The Collin County, Texas Soil Survey was initiated in 1962 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1965. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2001. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Five additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    BP-------Pit, Borrow GP-------Pit, Gravel M-W------Miscellaneous Water DAM------Dam W--------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2001 (process 6 of 66)
    The Cooke County, Texas Soil Survey was initiated in 1969 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1973. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2001. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Three additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    CP-------Caliche Pit DAM------Dam W--------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 1998 (process 7 of 66)
    The Dallas County Soil Survey was published in 1980 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map units names were finalized at the final correlation in 1975. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 1998. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Three additional map units were added to the soil survey. These changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map unit is as follows:

    DAM---Dams M-W---Miscellaneous Water W-----Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 1997 (process 8 of 66)
    The Denton County Soil Survey was published in 1980 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map units names were finalized at the final correlation in 1975. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 1997. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey and three map unit components needed updating. These changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map unit is as follows:

    9----Bastrop fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes (Bastsil) 10---Bastrop fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes (Bastsil) 79---Trinity clay, freqently flooded (Tinn) DAM--Dams W-----Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 1998 (process 9 of 66)
    The Ellis County Soil Survey was published in 1964 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1962. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 1998. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Four additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM---Dams M-W---Miscellaneous Water QU----Quarry W-----Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    (process 10 of 66)
    Field procedures for the Fannin County soil survey included plotting of soil boundaries determined by field observation and interpretation of remotely sensed data. Boundaries were verified at closely spaced intervals, and the soils in each delineation were identified by traversing and transecting the landscape. Soil scientists described and sampled the soils, analyzed samples in the laboratory, and statistically analyzed the data. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in March of 1988. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey. The change was made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. An admendment to the correlation document reflecting this change is on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM----Dams W------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • USGS1, NRCS1

    Date: 2000 (process 11 of 66)
    Field maps were manually compiled to 1:24,000 halftone film positives. Soil map unit delineations and special soil features were manually recompiled from the soil survey film positives (scale: 24,000) to 4 mil. annotated stable-base overlays that were registered to multiple 7.5 minute orthophotographs.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • USGS1, NRCS1, NRCS3, NRCS4, NRCS5

    Date: 2003 (process 12 of 66)
    The Freestone County Soil Survey was published in 2002 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map units names were finalized at the final correlation in 1986. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2002. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey. These changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    W-----Water M-W---Miscellaneous Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS1

    Date: 2002 (process 13 of 66)
    Publication atlas sheets and digital orthophotographic quarter quadrangles (DOQQ) were sent to Pixxures, Inc. for electronic map compilation. The publication atlas sheets were raster scanned on an ContexFSC Cougar scanner at 300 dots per inch. Raster borders of each atlas sheet were clipped. The clipped raster images were then rectified to DOQQ imagery, then appended to a soil survey wide raster image with ER Mapper, Version 6.1. Nine to twelve points per atlas raster image were selected for rectification to DOQQ imagery. Quality control routines were accomplished to ensure accurate rectification to DOQQ imagery. The rectified raster image was then converted to a georeferenced tif file. DOQQ imagery was then filtered out of the tif file, leaving soil delineations, mapunit labels, special and cultural features. Four corners of the 7.5 minute quadrangle were maintained during clip routines using OrthoVista, Version 3.2 software. AutoVue, Version 15.4 was used to convert georeferenced tif images to record length code (RLC) files. The RLC files were written to CD-ROM and delivered to the Natural Resources Conservation Service, Texas State Office in Temple, Texas.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS1, NRCS2, NRCS3

    Date: 2002 (process 14 of 66)
    The RLC images were imported into maps created in LT4X Version 4.11 by cartographic technicians at the Natural Resources Conservation Service, (NRCS) Temple Texas Digitizing and Certification Center. The data were created in North American Datum of 1983. The soil processing consisted of raster editing, map neatline development, labeling, edge matching and vector conversion. Special features were digitized on screen using the raster image as the source. The soil area features and special soil features were written to Digital Line Graph Optional format in LT4X. Digitizing and quality control were performed by the geographic information system specialist and cartographic technicians at the Temple Texas Digitizing and Certification Center.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS1, NRCS2

    Date: 2002 (process 15 of 66)
    The soil area features and special soil features DLGs were imported into ARC/INFO 7.2.1. The 7.5 minute quadrangles for each coverage were merged together into a soil survey area and additional editing was performed. The coverages were edge matched to existing SSURGO data. New DLGs reflecting these changes were written with ARC/INFO 7.2.1.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS1

    Date: 2003 (process 16 of 66)
    The soil survey area coverage was evaluated with the October 1998 ARC/INFO SSURGO Evaluation AMLs provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas. Upon successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the soil survey area coverage was processed with the October 1998 archiving AMLs provided by the National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS1

    Date: 1998 (process 17 of 66)
    The Grayson County Soil Survey was published in 1980 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map units names were finalized at the final correlation in 1977. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 1997. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey. These changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map unit is as follows:

    DAM---DAMS W-----Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2002 (process 18 of 66)
    The Grimes County Soil Survey was published in 1996 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1988. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2001. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM----Dam W------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS1

    Date: 1998 (process 19 of 66)
    The Hardin County Soil Survey was initiated in 1992, and the field mapping was completed in 1997. The classification and map units names were finalized at the final correlation in 1998. Field procedures for the second order soil survey included plotting and compilation of soil boundaries determined by field observation and interpretation of remotely sensed data. The soils in each delineation were identified by traversing and transecting the landscape. Soil scientists described and sampled the soils, analyzed samples in the laboratory, and statistically analyzed the data. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. One additional map unit was added to the soil survey. This change was made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. An amendment to the correlation document reflecting this change is on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map unit is as follows:

    LF----Landfill

    Data sources used in this process:

    • USGS2

    Date: 1996 (process 20 of 66)
    Soil survey data were manually compiled from the remote sensing imagery to the 1:24000 scale 7.5 minute ortho photobase film postives. Soil map unit delineations and special soils features were manually transferred from the 7.5 minute ortho photobase film postives to 4 mil stable-base material (annotated overlay).

    Data sources used in this process:

    • USGS1, USGS2, NRCS1

    Date: 2004 (process 21 of 66)
    The Henderson County Soil Survey was published in 1979 at 1:20000 scale. The classification and map units names were finalized at the final correlation in 1978. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2004. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Three additional map units were added to the soil survey. These changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM---Dams SPY---Spillways W-----Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2000 (process 22 of 66)
    The Hill County Soil Survey was published in 1978 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map units names were finalized at the final correlation in 1975. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 1999. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey. These changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map unit is as follows:

    DAM---DAMS W-----Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 1997 (process 23 of 66)
    The Hood and Somervell Counties Soil Survey was published in 1978 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map units names were finalized at the final correlation in 1974. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 1997. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. One additional map unit was added to the soil survey. The change was made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map unit is as follows:

    W-----Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2003 (process 24 of 66)
    The Houston County Soil Survey was published in 2002 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map units names were finalized at the final correlation in 1993. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2000. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Four additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    GP-----Gravel Pits DAM----Dams M-W----Miscellaneous Water W------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS1

    Date: 2001 (process 25 of 66)
    The Hunt County, Texas Soil Survey was initiated in 1973 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1977. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2001. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Three additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM------Dams M-W------Miscellaneous Water W--------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2000 (process 26 of 66)
    Field maps of Jack County were manually compiled to 1:24,000 halftone film positives. The special features and soil area features were manually recompiled from the soil survey film positives (scale: 24,000) to 4 mil. annotated stable-base overlays that were registered to multiple 7.5 minute orthophotographs.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • USGS1
    • NRCS1
    • NRCS2
    • NRCS3
    • NRCS4

    Date: 1998 (process 27 of 66)
    The Johnson County Soil Survey was published in 1985 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1981. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 1998. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey. These changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map unit is as follows:

    DAM---DAMS W-----Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2001 (process 28 of 66)
    The Kaufman and Rockwall Counties, Texas Soil Survey was initiated in 1970 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1973. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2001. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Nine additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    BP-------Pit, Borrow CP-------Pit, Clay DAM------Dam GP-------Pit, Gravel M-W------Miscellaneous Water Q--------Quarry RP-------Pit, Rock SL-------Sanitary Landfill SM-------Strip Mine W--------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2003 (process 29 of 66)
    The Leon County, Texas Soil Survey was published in 1989 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1985. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2003. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Four additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM-----Dams GPR-----Gravel Pits SPY-----Spillway W-------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 1986 (process 30 of 66)
    Liberty County Field procedures for the second order soil survey included plotting of soil boundaries determined by field obeservation and interpretation of remotely sensed data. Boundaries were verified at closely spaced intervals, and the soils in each delineation were identified by traversing and transecting the landscape. Soil scientists described and sampled the soils, analyzed samples in the laboratory, and statistically analyzed the data. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in August 1986.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • USGS1

    Date: 1995 (process 31 of 66)
    Field maps were manually compiled to 1:24,000 scale one-third quadrangle format orthophotographs. The soil map unit delineations and special soils features were manually recompiled from the one-third quadrangle orthophotographs to an overlay registered to the 7.5 minute quadrangle orthophotographs.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • USGS1
    • USGS2
    • NRCS1
    • USGS3

    Date: 1996 (process 32 of 66)
    The special soil features were manually digitized at a resolution of 0.01 inch using GRASS 4.0. The soil map unit delineation overlays were raster scanned on an Ideal FSS 5000 Scanner at a scanning resolution of 300 DPI. The processing, raster editing, map neatline development, labeling, edgematching, and vector conversion and editing were done in LT4X Version 3.21. The data were exported from LT4X and imported into GRASS Version 4.0. Further editing of this data was done in GRASS Version 4.13. The data were created and maintained in North American Datum 1927. The data were written to Digital Line Graph Optional format with the v.out.dlg command. Compilation, digitizing and quality control were done by the state soil scientist, the geographic information system specialist, and cartographic technicians at the Texas State Office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The digital soil and special soil features were also reviewed by the National Cartography and Geospatial Center of the Natural Resources Conservation Service for adherence to SSURGO standards in February 1996. The NRCS, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, SSURGO Support Section imported the data for verification in ARC/INFO 7.0.4. The data were edited. New DLGs reflecting these changes were written with ARC/INFO 7.0.4.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS1

    Date: 2001 (process 33 of 66)
    The Limestone County, Texas Soil Survey was initiated in 1987 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1991. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2001. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    M-W------Miscellaneous Water W--------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2000 (process 34 of 66)
    The Madison County Soil Survey was published in 1994 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1972. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 1989. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    GP-----Pits, Gravel W------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2001 (process 35 of 66)
    The Montague County, Texas Soil Survey was initiated in 1967 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1975. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2001. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM------Dams W--------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2003 (process 36 of 66)
    The Navarro County Soil Survey was published in 1974 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map units names were finalized at the final correlation in 1968. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2002. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Five additional map units were added to the soil survey. These changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM---Dams BP----Pits, Borrow CP----Pits, Clay GP----Pits, Gravel W-----Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2001 (process 37 of 66)
    The Parker County, Texas Soil Survey was initiated in 1956 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1973. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2001. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Three additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM------Dams QU-------Quarry W--------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 2000 (process 38 of 66)
    The Polk and San Jacinto Counties, Texas Soil Survey was published in 1988 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1983. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 1999. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM----Dams W------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 1997 (process 39 of 66)
    The Tarrant County Soil Survey was published in 1981 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map units names were finalized at the final correlation in 1978. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 1997. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Three additional map units were added to the soil survey. These changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map unit is as follows:

    DAM---DAMS M-W---Miscellaneous Water W-----Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 1998 (process 40 of 66)
    The Trinity County Soil Survey was initiated in 1992 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1999. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 1999. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. The correlation document is on file at the NRCS Texas State Office.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS1

    Date: 1999 (process 41 of 66)
    Soil survey data were manually compiled from the remote sensing imagery to the 1:24000 scale 7.5 minute orthophotographic base film positives. Soil map unit delineations and special soil features were manually recompiled from the 7.5 minute orthophotographic base film positives to 4 mil. annotated stable-base overlays.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • USGS1
    • USGS2
    • NRCS1

    Date: 2001 (process 42 of 66)
    The Van Zandt County, Texas Soil Survey was initiated in 1979 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1995. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2001. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM------Dam W--------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS1

    Date: 2003 (process 43 of 66)
    The Walker County Soil Survey was published in 1979 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification and map units names were finalized at the final correlation in 1975. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2001. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. Two additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    M-W----Miscellaneous Water W------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1

    Date: 1997 (process 44 of 66)
    Publication atlas sheets and digital orthophotographic quarter quadrangles (DOQQ) were sent to Pixxures, Inc.for electronic map compilation. The publication atlas sheets were raster scanned on an ContexFSC Cougar scanner at 300 dots per inch. Raster borders of each atlas sheet were clipped. The clipped raster images were then rectified to DOQQ imagery, then appended to a soil survey wide raster image with ER Mapper, Version 6.1. Nine to twelve points per atlas raster image were selected for rectification to DOQQ imagery. Quality controlroutines were accomplished to ensure accurate rectification to DOQQ imagery. The rectified raster image was then converted to a georeferenced tif file. DOQQ imagery was then filtered out of the tif file, leaving soil delineations, mapunit labels, special and cultural features. Four corners of the 7.5 minute quadrangle were maintained during clip routines using OrthoVista, Version 3.2 software. AutoVue, Version 15.4 was used to convert georeferenced tif images to record length code (RLC) files. The RLC files were written to CD-ROM and delivered to the Natural Resources Conservation Service, Texas State Office in Temple, Texas.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1
    • NRCS1
    • NRCS2

    Date: 2003 (process 45 of 66)
    The Young County Soil Survey was initiated in 1992 at 1:24,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 2003. Field procedures for the second order soil survey included plotting and compilation of soil boundaries determined by field observation and interpretation of remotely sensed data. The soils in each delineation were identified by traversing and transecting the landscape. Soil scientists described and sampled the soils, analyzed samples in the laboratory, and statistically analyzed the data.Three additional map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Texas State Office. The additional map units are as follows:

    DAM----Dams GP-----Gravel Pits W------Water

    Data sources used in this process:

    • USGS1
    • USGS2

    Date: 1999 (process 46 of 66)
    Soil survey data were manually compiled from the remote sensing imagery to the 1:24000 scale 7.5 minute orthophotographic base film positives. Soil map unit delineations and special soil features were manually recompiled from the 7.5 minute orthophotographic base film positives to 4 mil. annotated stable-base overlays.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • USGS1
    • USGS2
    • NRCS1

    Date: 2003 (process 47 of 66)
    The final publication negatives were used to develop ratioed soil survey film positives. Soil map unit delineations were manually recompiled from the soil survey film positives (scale: 24,000) to 4 mil. annotated stable-base overlays that were registered to multiple 7.5 minute orthophotographs.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1
    • NRCS1
    • NRCS2
    • NRCS3
    • NRCS4

    Date: 2003 (process 48 of 66)
    During the map compilation quality review an evaluation was made of the map unit joins for surrounding soil surveys by a soil data quality specialist.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1
    • NRCS2
    • NRCS3
    • NRCS4

    Date: 2003 (process 49 of 66)
    The annotated overlays were raster scanned on a SCANGRAPHICS CF 500 Scanner at a resolution of 300 dpi. The soil area features and special soil features were processed in LT4X Version 4.11. The soil processing consisted of raster editing, map neat line development, labeling, edge matching and vector conversion. The soil area features and special soil features were written to Digital Line Graph Optional format in LT4X. Digitizing and quality control were done by the geographic information system specialists and cartographic technicians at the Temple Texas Digitizing and Certification Center.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1
    • NRCS4

    Date: 2003 (process 50 of 66)
    The Temple Texas Digitizing and Certification Center imported the soil area features and special soil features DLGs into ARC/INFO 7.2.1. The 7.5 minute quadrangles for each coverage were merged together into a soil survey area and additional editing was performed. The coverages were edge matched to existing SSURGO data. New DLGs reflecting these changes were written with ARC/INFO 7.2.1.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • SCS1
    • NRCS4

    Date: 2003 (process 51 of 66)
    The DLG-3 Optional format files were evaluated with the October 1998 ARC/INFO SSURGO Evaluation AMLs provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas. Upon successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the DLGs were processed with the October 1998 archiving AMLs provided by the National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS4

    Date: 2004 (process 52 of 66)
    The spatial data has been revised along the county boundary. The soil survey area coverage was evaluated with the December 2003 ARC/INFO SSURGO Evaluation AMLs provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas. Upon successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the soil survey area coverage was processed with the December 2003 archiving AMLs provided by the National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS5

    Date: 2004 (process 53 of 66)
    The National Soil Information System database was developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service soil scientists according to national standards.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NRCS5

    Date: 15-Nov-2004 (process 54 of 66)
    The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASIS

    Date: 15-Nov-2004 (process 55 of 66)
    The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASIS

    Date: 13-Sep-2005 (process 56 of 66)
    The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASIS

    Date: 14-Sep-2005 (process 57 of 66)
    The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The local interpretations were renamed, fully documented, and debugged. The component.albedo_dry_r data element was populated. A correlation amendment was executed by the MLRA 9 Office and this action changed some of the map unit names and component names. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the Soil Data Warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASIS

    Date: 18-Dec-2005 (process 58 of 66)
    The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASIS

    Date: 19-Dec-2005 (process 59 of 66)
    The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The data elements used as criteria to generate the National Hydric Soil List have been populated. Component names for miscellaneous areas were validated and edited, where appropriate, in order to comply with National Soil Survey Handbook (NSSH) guidelines and NSSH Exhibit 627-1. Minor component names have been edited, where appropriate, in order to comply with guidelines in the NSSH. The local phase field has been used to store component phase information that was populated as part of the component name in the past. The military interpretations have been renamed with (DOD) rather than (TX) at the end of each rule name. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASIS

    Date: 28-Dec-2005 (process 60 of 66)
    The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASIS

    Date: 28-Dec-2005 (process 61 of 66)
    The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. Some missing data elements used as criteria to generate the National Hydric Soil List were populated. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASIS

    Date: 11-Jul-2006 (process 62 of 66)
    The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASIS

    Date: 11-Jul-2006 (process 63 of 66)
    The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASIS

    Date: 02-Jan-2007 (process 64 of 66)
    The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASIS

    Date: 02-Jan-2007 (process 65 of 66)
    The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASIS

    Date: 30-Mar-2007 (process 66 of 66)
    The tabular data were extracted from the data mart without change. The spatial data was exported to an ESRI shapefile.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • NASIS

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    Attribute accuracy is tested by manual comparison of the source with hard copy plots and/or symbolized display of the map data on an interactive computer graphic system. Selected attributes that cannot be visually verified on plots or on screen are interactively queried and verified on screen. In addition, the attributes are tested against a master set of valid attributes. All attribute data conform to the attribute codes in the signed classification and correlation document and amendment(s).

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    The accuracy of these digital data is based upon their compilation to base maps that meet National Map Accuracy Standards at a scale of 1 inch equals 1,000 feet. The difference in positional accuracy between the soil boundaries and special soil features locations in the field and their digitized map locations is unknown. The locational accuracy of soil delineations on the ground varies with the transition between map units.

    For example, on long gently sloping landscapes the transition occurs gradually over many feet. Where landscapes change abruptly from steep to level, the transition will be very narrow. Soil delineation boundaries and special soil features generally were digitized within 0.01 inch of their locations on the digitizing source. The digital map elements are edge matched between data sets. The data along each quadrangle edge are matched against the data for the adjacent quadrangle. Edge locations generally do not deviate from centerline to centerline by more than 0.01 inch.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    A map unit is a collection of areas defined and named in terms of their soil components or miscellaneous areas or both. Each map unit differs in some respect from all others in a survey area and each map unit has a symbol that uniquely identifies the map unit on a soil map. Each individual area, point, or line so identified on the map is a delineation.

    Soil Scientists identify small areas of soils or miscellaneous areas that have properties and behavior significantly different than the named soils in the surrounding map unit. These minor components may be indicated as special features. If they have a minimal effect on use and management, or could not be precisely located, they may not be indicated on the map.

    A map unit has specified kinds of soils or miscellaneous areas (map unit components), each with a designated range in proportionate extent. Map units include one or more kinds of soil or miscellaneous area. Miscellaneous areas are areas that have little or no recognizable soil.

    Specific National Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures were used in the classification of soils, design and name of map units, and location of special soil features. These standards are outlined in Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, NRCS; Agricultural Handbook 436, Soil Taxonomy, 1995, USDA, NRCS; and all Amendments; Keys to Soil Taxonomy, (current issue) USDA, NRCS; National Soil Survey Handbook, title 430-VI,(current issue) USDA, NRCS.

    The actual composition and interpretive purity of the map unit delineations were based on data collected by scientists during the course of preparing the soil maps. Adherence to National Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures is based on peer review, quality control, and quality assurance. Quality control is outlined in the memorandum of understanding for the soil survey area and in documents that reside with the Natural Resources Conservation Service state soil scientist. Four kinds of map units are used in soil surveys: consociations, complexes, associations, and undifferentiated groups.

    Consociations - Consociations are named for the dominant soil. In a consociation, delineated areas use a single name from the dominant component in the map unit. Dissimilar components are minor in extent. The soil component in a consociation may be identified at any taxonomic level. Soil series is the lowest taxonomic level. A consociation that is named as a miscellaneous area is dominantly that kind of area and minor components do not significantly affect the use of the map unit. The total amount of dissimilar inclusions of other components in a map unit generally does not exceed about 15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if nonlimiting. A single component of a dissimilar limiting inclusion generally does not exceed 10 percent if very contrasting.

    Complexes and associations - Complexes and associations consist of two or more dissimilar components that occur in a regularly repeating pattern. The total amount of other dissimilar components is minor extent. The following arbitrary rule determines whether complex or association is used in the name. The major components of an association can be separated at the scale of mapping. In either case, because the major components are sufficiently different in morphology or behavior, the map unit cannot be called a consociation. In each delineation of a complex or an association, each major component is normally present though their proportions may vary appreciably from one delineation to another. The total amount of inclusions in a map unit that are dissimilar to any of the major components does not exceed 15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if nonlimiting. A single kind of dissimilar limiting inclusion usually does not exceed 10 percent.

    Undifferentiated groups - Undifferentiated groups consist of two or more components that are not consistently associated geographically and, therefore, do not always occur together in the same map delineation. These components are included in the same named map unit because their use and management are the same or very similar for common uses. Generally they are grouped together because some common feature, such as steepness, stoniness, or flooding, determines their use and management. If two or more additional map units would serve no useful purpose, they may be included in the same unit. Each delineation has at least one of the major components, and some may have all of them. The same principles regarding the proportion of minor components that apply to consociations also apply to undifferentiated groups. The same principles regarding proportion of inclusion apply to undifferentiated groups as to consociations.

    Minimum documentation consists of three complete soil profile descriptions that are collected for each soil added to the legend, one additional per 3,000 acres mapped; three 10 observation transects for each map unit, one additional 10 point transect per 3,000 acres.

    A defined standard or level of confidence in the interpretive purity of the map unit delineations is attained by adjusting the kind and intensity of field investigations. Field investigations and data collection are carried out in sufficient detail to name map units and to identify accurately and consistently areas of about 10 acres.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    Certain node/geometry and topology GT-polygon/chain relationships are collected or generated to satisfy topological requirements (the GT-polygon corresponds to the soil delineation). Some of these requirements include: chains must begin and end at nodes, chains must connect to each other at nodes, chains do not extend through nodes, left and right GT-polygons are defined for each chain element and are consistent throughout, and the chains representing the limits of the file are free of gaps. The tests of logical consistency are performed using vendor software. All internal polygons are tested for closure with vendor software and are checked on hard copy plots. All data are checked for common soil lines (i.e., adjacent polygons with the same label). Edge locations generally do not deviate from centerline to centerline by more than 0.01 inch. The feature edges and descriptive attributes of the quadrangles in the Soil Survey counties match with the quadrangles in the adjacent Soil Survey counties. The feature labels do not match.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, should be acknowledged as the data source in products derived from these data.

This data set is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool in permitting or citing decisions, but may be used as a reference source. This is public information and may be interpreted by organizations, agencies, units of government, or others based on needs; however, they are responsible for the appropriate application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service any authority for the decisions that they make. The Natural Resources Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs.

Photographic or digital enlargement of these maps to scales greater than at which they were originally mapped can cause misinterpretation of the data. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The depicted soil boundaries, interpretations, and analysis derived from them do not eliminate the need for onsite sampling, testing, and detailed study of specific sites for intensive uses. Thus, these data and their interpretations are intended for planning purposes only. Digital data files are periodically updated. Files are dated, and users are responsible for obtaining the latest version of the data.

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
    501 West Felix Street, Building 23, P.O. Box 6567
    Fort Worth, Texas 76115

    800 672 5559 (voice)
    817 509 3469 (FAX)

  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    Anderson County, Texas SSURGO Archer County, Texas SSURGO Chambers County, Texas SSURGO Clay County, Texas SSURGO Collin County, Texas SSURGO Cooke County, Texas SSURGO Dallas County, Texas SSURGO Denton County, Texas SSURGO Ellis County, Texas SSURGO Fannin County, Texas SSURGO Freestone County, Texas SSURGO Grayson County, Texas SSURGO Grimes County, Texas SSURGO Hardin County, Texas SSURGO Henderson County, Texas SSURGO Hill County, Texas SSURGO Hood County, Texas SSURGO Houston County, Texas SSURGO Hunt County, Texas SSURGO Jack County, Texas SSURGO Johnson County, Texas SSURGO Kaufman County, Texas SSURGO Leon County, Texas SSURGO Liberty County, Texas SSURGO Limestone County, Texas SSURGO Madison County, Texas SSURGO Montague County, Texas SSURGO Navarro County, Texas SSURGO Parker County, Texas SSURGO Polk County, Texas SSURGO Rockwall County, Texas SSURGO San Jacinto County, Texas SSURGO Tarrant County, Texas SSURGO Trinity County, Texas SSURGO Van Zandt County, Texas SSURGO Walker County, Texas SSURGO Wise County, Texas SSURGO Young County, Texas SSURGO

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, no warranty expressed or implied is made by the Agency regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. The U.S. Department of Agriculture will warrant the delivery of this product in computer readable format, and will offer appropriate adjustment of credit when the product is determined unreadable by correctly adjusted computer input peripherals, or when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition. Request for adjustment of credit must be made within 90 days from the date of this shipment from the ordering site.

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture, nor any of its agencies are liable for misuse of the data, for damage, for transmission of viruses, or for computer contamination through the distribution of these data sets. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 20-Aug-2007
Metadata author:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
c/o REQUIRED: The person responsible for the metadata information.
State Soil Scientist
USDA-NRCS
Temple, Tx 76501

1-254-742-9851 (voice)
1-254-742-9859 (FAX)
levi.steptoe@tx.usda.nrcs.gov

Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
Metadata extensions used:


Generated by mp version 2.8.6 on Mon Aug 20 13:56:19 2007